Respondent vs. User Testing
90%+ savings with Respondent
- Fast and Easy ~10 mins to match
- 95%+ Participants invited attend your study
- ZERO license fees + unlimited seats
-
-
User Testing
User Testing
|
||
|---|---|---|
150 B2B participants (Annual subscription)Including unlimited free seats |
$500 / mo.(Save ~90%) |
>$2,500 / mo.
|
|
Participant Pool
|
2.6M+ high quality participants Target by demographic and professional filters |
Questionable participant quality Limited demographic targeting |
|
Research Methods
|
User interviews, focus groups, surveys, usability testing and more |
Primarily for high-volume, unmoderated studies |
|
Compatibility with other tools
|
Recruit on Respondent to conduct research on any tool including Survey Monkey, Lookback, Qualtrics, Zoom, DScout or even User Testing. | Limited to User Testing's own research platform |
|
Participant Incentives
|
Custom incentives for each project |
Fixed incentive rates |
|
Pay As You Go
Including unlimited free seats
|
$65 per B2B participant $39 per B2C participant |
No free or PAYG option |
|
Ideal for
|
Respondent works best for research teams who value participant quality and precise targeting at an affordable price and want to recruit, screen, schedule and pay in a single platform. It is best suited for teams that use multiple research methods and/or research tools |
User Testing works best for research teams with few budget constraints, who need a high-volume of user testers for short projects and do not need B2B participant verification or precise targeting. |
"Sourcing specialized participants like data scientists and systems engineers used to take 2-4 weeks of product managers’ time; with Respondent, IBM can find them in 2-3 days — and recruit past participants at no additional cost."
"The participants have been who they say they are, we can verify them, and they’re super responsive. When we turn to our clients, we know we can produce quality insights. Respondent has helped us do better research and be better researchers."
"Using Respondent, we have been able to cut our research time down from months to days. Not only that, but the quality of our research has also gone up."
